Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Man on Fire (1957)

March 11th 2008 08:37


‘When you’re in love, you’re a man on fire, and a man on fire is a man to behold’ the lyrics to the opening song of Man on Fire (1957) state. Bing Crosby plays the ‘man on fire’ in this dated and cringe worthy tale about a man trying to gain custody of his son after his ex remarries. Bing, however, is not a man to behold. The character Bing portrays, factory manager, Earl Carlton, is a dull, uncharismatic and bitter man. When his ex-wife (Mary Fickett) and her new smooth-talking lawyer husband ask for full custody of Carlton’s annoying son, Carlton does everything he can to keep full custody of him.


Man on Fire treats the subject of divorce and child custody as if it’s a taboo. Perhaps the subject matter would have been more controversial and interesting to 1950s audiences, but in 2008, Man on Fire plays like a boring and old fashioned instruction film about the dangers of divorce. I wouldn’t be surprised if this film was the first film to deal with the subject of child custody and divorced parents.

The romance between research assistant, Nina Wylie (Inger Stevens) and Carlton is confusing simply because it is unbelievable that Nina would fall for the unlikeable, Carlton. It is because Carlton and his son are so hard to sympathize with that I really did not care about his custody battle. His attachment to his son is, quite frankly, a little overbearing and creepy.

After everything that Carlton goes through, does he learn a lesson? Who cares. I didn’t.

Give this piece of tedious melodrama a miss.

½ out of 5

Google


98
Vote
Shared on


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
2 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Harry

March 12th 2008 01:03
I like the tag line -- "powerful story of modern emotions" -- that just about says it all..

Comment by JohnDoe

March 12th 2008 02:01
Hi Clinton,

I agree this film has lost it's power over the years, but not necessarily its relevance.

I find the movie a fun postcard to a repressed society...it has dated certainly but thats the novelty of the piece.....breaking the status quo of a more conservative era.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
4 Posts
7 Posts
1 Posts
26 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

brandon 1's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by brandon 1
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]